Dre4m Shell
Server IP : 85.214.239.14  /  Your IP : 18.118.93.61
Web Server : Apache/2.4.62 (Debian)
System : Linux h2886529.stratoserver.net 4.9.0 #1 SMP Tue Jan 9 19:45:01 MSK 2024 x86_64
User : www-data ( 33)
PHP Version : 7.4.18
Disable Function : pcntl_alarm,pcntl_fork,pcntl_waitpid,pcntl_wait,pcntl_wifexited,pcntl_wifstopped,pcntl_wifsignaled,pcntl_wifcontinued,pcntl_wexitstatus,pcntl_wtermsig,pcntl_wstopsig,pcntl_signal,pcntl_signal_get_handler,pcntl_signal_dispatch,pcntl_get_last_error,pcntl_strerror,pcntl_sigprocmask,pcntl_sigwaitinfo,pcntl_sigtimedwait,pcntl_exec,pcntl_getpriority,pcntl_setpriority,pcntl_async_signals,pcntl_unshare,
MySQL : OFF  |  cURL : OFF  |  WGET : ON  |  Perl : ON  |  Python : ON  |  Sudo : ON  |  Pkexec : OFF
Directory :  /proc/2/cwd/proc/self/root/proc/self/root/usr/share/doc/amavisd-new/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Command :


[ HOME SHELL ]     

Current File : /proc/2/cwd/proc/self/root/proc/self/root/usr/share/doc/amavisd-new/README.CVE-2024-28054
# Problem description

Emails which consist of multiple parts (`Content-Type: multipart/*`)
incorporate boundary information stating at which point one part ends and the
next part begins.

A boundary is announced by an Content-Type header's `boundary` parameter. To
our current knowledge, RFC2046 and RFC2045 do not explicitly specify how a
parser should handle multiple boundary parameters that contain conflicting
values. As a result, there is no canonical choice which of the values should or
should not be used for mime part decomposition.

It turns out that MIME::Parser from MIME-tools chooses the last `boundary`
parameter of a Content-Type-header, while several mail user agents choose the
first occuring one. As a consequence, Amavis will apply some of its routines to
content that a receiving MUA will not see, and vice-versa will not apply them
to content that the receiving MUA will see. Such routines are at least
- the banned-files check, and
- the virus check, unless
  - Amavis feeds the whole email into the virus scanner, and
  - the virus scanner implements its own email parsing that aligns with the
    receiving MUA's parser implementation.

MIME::Parser does not provide a choice which of multiple `boundary` parameters
shall be used for parsing, but it will give feedback in such a case [1], which
Amavis can react to.
Emails with ambiguous content, like multiple `boundary` parameters as described
above, will be categorized as `CC_UNCHECKED,3`, since Amavis has no information
about the recipient's MUA's parser implementation.

# Recommendation

Legitimate emails are not expected to have ambiguous content, so an Amavis setup
should treat them harshly. The new default configuration for `CC_UNCHECKED,3` is
defanging:

```
$defang_by_ccat{CC_UNCHECKED.",3"} = 1; # ambiguous content (e.g. multipart boundary)
```

Another possibility would be quarantining, e.g. via

```
$quarantine_to_maps_by_ccat{CC_UNCHECKED.",3"} = [1];
$quarantine_method_by_ccat{CC_UNCHECKED.",3"} = 'local:unchecked-ambiguous-%m';
```

and/or discarding/rejecting the email:

```
$final_destiny_maps_by_ccat{CC_UNCHECKED.",3"} = D_REJECT; # or D_DISCARD
```

[1] https://metacpan.org/release/DSKOLL/MIME-tools-5.514/changes

Anon7 - 2022
AnonSec Team